Defense News
12/12/2011
S. Korea’s F-16
Upgrade Contest Could Affect Taiwan
By WENDELL MINNICK
TAIPEI — BAE Systems and Lockheed
Martin are locking horns over an estimated $1 billion program for the avionics
upgrade and weapon systems integration on 135 KF-16C/D Block 52 fighters for
the South Korean air force. The price tag does not include procurement of
weapons or radar.
The competitive
programs have direct implications for upcoming bids sought by Taiwan to upgrade
146 F-16A/B Block 20s in 2012. Both companies submitted the prime integration
proposals on Dec. 2 to the Korean Defense Acquisition Program Administration.
“No matter who
wins in [South] Korea, they will surely benefit commercially from that
competition,” said Ralf Persson, BAE vice president of international
marketing.
Lockheed appears
unconcerned about BAE’s challenge. Laura Siebert, Lockheed’s F-16 spokeswoman,
noted that the company worked with the U.S. Air Force on the recent upgrade of
South Korea’s F-16C/D Block 32s, and the company is confident it will continue
to manage such programs in South Korea. “This program is ongoing and when
implemented, will result in an aircraft configuration that is very much like
the USAF Block 40 and 50 fleet,” Siebert said. “Consequently, knowledge of the
entire system, including the weapons and associated delivery system, is
necessary to ensure a low-risk program.” Siebert said one key area is the
installation and integration of the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
radar, with which Lockheed has a unique history.
“We have
integrated AESA radars into all of our current fighter programs: the F-16
[Block 60], the F-22 and the F-35,” giving Lockheed a “baseline knowledge of
the aircraft and the experience to ensure that the job is done right and within
the cost and schedule that our customer demands.”
Taiwan Upgrades
Despite Lockheed’s
history of building and upgrading F-16s, BAE feels strongly that the Korea upgrade
bidding process will encourage Taiwan to consider a BAE bid to upgrade Taiwan’s
F-16A/Bs.
The two programs
are “almost identical,” said Persson. “We believe it would be in Taiwan’s
interests to open it up and that they should look to [South] Korea as an
example.” In September, the U.S. government released a $5.3 billion retrofit
program to Taiwan to upgrade 146 F-16A/B fighters procured during the early
1990s. Included in the package is the AESA radar, Embedded Global Positioning
System Inertial Navigation System and the Terma ALQ-213 Electronic Warfare
Management System. The price includes procurement of weapons and AESA radar.
At present,
Lockheed is the sole source for the upgrade and integration, but BAE is now
lobbying Taiwan officials to allow BAE to compete against Lockheed.
“A competition
offers the best deal for Taiwan. They will realize significant savings no
matter who wins, and it is also the most fair, open and honest approach,”
Persson said.
An Oct. 12
directive issued by Taiwan’s legislature requires that the letter-of-acceptance
for the F-16 upgrade package “shall not specify any specific supplier and that
the Ministry of National Defense shall request a U.S. team to perform an open
competition.” Though BAE attempts to link the South Korean and Taiwan F-16
upgrade programs, Lockheed insists the programs are not “identical,” but there
are “some elements which are common to the [South] Korean program — namely a
request for an AESA radar,” Siebert said.
One advantage that
BAE Systems has is an “Ethernet design” for the fire control computer, Persson
said.
There are two F-16
operational flight programs in USAF service: the Lockheed M-Tape, which is
hosted on the modular mission computer built by Raytheon using Lockheed
software; and BAE’s SCU-Tape, hosted on BAE’s fire control computer.
The SCU-Tape
passed full USAF operational test and evaluation in April 2010, and has been
installed on more than 270 USAF F-16s and has flown in combat operations,
Persson said.
“In response,
Lockheed is offering a new development [modular mission computer] with
Ethernet, but this MMC has not yet passed USAF OT&E nor is it in service on
any F-16 aircraft,” he said.
Lockheed’s Siebert
did not respond to the Ethernet issue, but said the integration and
installation of the AESA was a “complex task.” Further, “the radar is obviously
one of the key components in a fighter aircraft and the task associated with changing
radars is integrated throughout the fire control system…[and] it is this new
AESA configuration that we have had considerable interest from our USAF and
several international customers.”
No comments:
Post a Comment